Welcome to the PANG Website! Who are we? The Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG) plays the role
of the Pacific regional “peoples’ watchdog on trade issues”.PANG was established in 2000 by regional NGOs
concerned that Pacific civil society was being left out of the debate on trade
liberalisation and that the free-trade agenda lacked a focus on key goals of
human development and poverty reduction. PANG is a research, education, and
advocacy organisation.PANG provides
considered research and analysis on trade issues, and regular media input – on
trade and human development – across the region.PANG also plays a very important campaigning
role, lobbying to have the concerns of Pacific civil society heard in fora
where the Pacific’s economic future is increasingly determined.
Ultimately, PANG aims to improve effective and democratic
governance in the Pacific, by empowering Pacific civil society and private
sectors to engage the decision making process around trade and economic
planning.
Contact PANG: Ph: (679) 331 6722 or email: coordinator@pang.org.fj To recieve regular updates on issues of trade and justice in the Pacific, email media@pang.org.fj
Breaking News
Find out latest in trade and globalisation issues facing the Pacific (Updated August 26, 2008).
Pacific civil society organisations, unions and churches issue joint statement on trade justice (August 22, 2008) Pacific
civil society organisations (CSOs) met in Auckland NZ in mid-August to discuss
issues relating to a new free trade agreement (FTA) with the Australia and
NZ under the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER). The
meeting was held as part of the 2008 annual Pacific CSO Forum – hosted by the
Pacific Island Association of Non-Government Organisations (PIANGO) – in the lead-up
to the 2008 Pacific Island Forum Leaders meeting in Niue. Meeting
participants issued a Pacific Civil Society Organisations Statement on Trade
Justice listing key demands in relation to any FTA negotiations under
PACER. Fei Tevi,
General Secretary of the Pacific Conference of Churches said trade could help
to promote development, but he said Australia and NZ had only one model
of trade for the Pacific in mind. “That model, of a new World Trade
Organisation compatible FTA with Australia and NZ could potentially
be a disaster for the Pacific, said Mr Tevi. “Even supporters of a new
FTA acknowledge there will be high costs – like job losses and reductions in
government revenue. “This joint
statement is calling on our leaders to ensure that there arealternatives
and that trade arrangements with Australia and NZ should be based on
justice and should enhance social development in the Pacific.” The
Pacific Civil Society Statement on Trade Justice was endorsed by the
following organisations: Pacific Island Association of NGOs, Pacific Conference
of Churches, Pacific Network on Globalisation, South Pacific and Oceanic
Council of Trade Unions, Oxfam New Zealand, Vanuatu Association of NGOs, O Le
Siosiomaga Society Incorporated (Samoa), Samoa Umbrella for NGOs (SUNGO), Fiji
Women’s Crisis Centre, PACFAW, Fiji Council of Social Services, Tuvalu
Association of NGOs (TANGO), Federated States of Micronesia Alliance of NGOs
(FANGO), and the Development Resource Centre (NZ). See Pacific
Civil Society Statement on Trade Justice for full statement. See here for accompanying press release.
"A new World Trade
Organisation compatible FTA with Australia and NZ could potentially be a disaster for the Pacific... trade arrangements with Australia and NZ should be based on
justice and should enhance social development in the Pacific." - Fei Tevi, General Secretary, Pacific Conference of Churches
Making Waves – PANG releases report on free trade
negotiations facing the Pacific (August 19, 2008) The Pacific Network
on Globalisation (PANG) has prepared a report on the major free trade
agreements facing the Pacific Island Countries. Making Waves: Opportunities for Reclaiming Development in
the Pacific (Informing civil society responses to the free trade agenda) was
prepared for the 2008 Annual Pacific Civil Society Organisation (CSO) Forum,
held in Auckland NZ, August 12-14. Making Waves was prepared by
Maureen Penjueli, Coordinator, PANG, and Wesley Morgan, Communications Officer,
PANG. The report was prepared in collaboration with Nick Braxton,
Advocacy and Research Officer, Oxfam New Zealand, and Professor Jane Kelsey,
Professor of Law, AucklandUniversity. See: Making Waves
for full PDF of the report.
Australia bullies Pacific trade ministers to try and rush FTA process (August 4, 2008) Australian trade
officials used the Pacific Forum Trade Ministers' meeting in the Cook Islands
(June 22, 2008) to try to pressure Pacific trade ministers to push ahead with
free trade negotiations, despite the fact the Pacific is in no way ready for
those negotiations, and is still negotiating a free trade agreement with the
EU.
Australian officials were hoping for a ‘heads of agreement’ with Pacific
ministers – outlining what areas would be included under any FTA negotiations,
and formalising the negotiating process – but this was vigorously resisted by
Pacific trade ministers. Australia
and NZ rejected Pacific proposals for the establishment of a regional trade
negotiating team to engage in free trade negotiations under PACER-Plus –
offering instead to support training of trade officials from each Pacific
country.
PANG is concerned that while negotiations haven’t even begun, the Australians
are splitting the region, by refusing to support a regional negotiating office,
and by holding out carrots – like new workers’ schemes – to gain support from individual
Pacific countries.
“It would be unfortunate if Australia and NZ were to use their position
as key aid donor countries for the region, to secure their own trade interests
in any FTA negotiations,” said PANG Coordinator Maureen Penjueli.
See here
for PANG Press Release on Forum Trade Ministers’ Meeting, which was
disseminated widely in Pacific media.
A flawed approach? Questioning the place of labour mobility in free trade agreements (August 4, 2008) “Under pressure to
sign on to new free trade agreements, Pacific Island governments interested in
securing positive outcomes for their peoples see deals on labour mobility as
potential development gains… But is this the right approach? And what are the
potential costs?...” PANG prepared an in-depth article for the August edition of the Island
Business magazine, on labour mobility and free trade agreements. That article,
which argues for separating labour mobility discussions from FTA discussions, is
now available here.
Call for moratorium on PICTA services negotiations (July 25, 2008) In light of
serious deficiencies in public consultation and Government preparedness around
the region, PANG is calling for a moratorium on Service sector negotiations as
part of the Pacific Island Countries Trade Agreement (PICTA). No social
impact assessments have been completed, nor have any regulatory reviews, and
trade officials have admitted privately that they don’t understand
the implications sufficiently to conclude negotiations at this stage.
Nevertheless, negotiations continue with a view towards Pacific Island
Countries listing four service sectors for liberalisation under PICTA by
October 2008.PANG is calling for an immediate moratorium on the PICTA services
negotiations until appropriate social impact assessments, and regulatory reviews,
have been completed. More genuine consultation with industry and civil
society groups on including services under PICTA is also needed. See here
for a PANG Press Release on the call for a moratorium, which was disseminated
widely in Pacific media.
PANG facilitates
regional trade union seminar on free trade in the Pacific (June 28, 2008) This month PANG worked with the International Labour
Organisation (ILO) to facilitate a Pacific trade union seminar on Free Trade, Decent Work and Social
Development in the Pacific – Trade union responses to the EU-ACP EPA, PICTA and
PACER.Held in Nadi from June 24-26,
the conference saw trade unionists from across the region discuss the multiple
free trade agreements facing the Islands,
their implications for working people, and appropriate trade union responses.PANG prepared an extensive background paper
for conference participants, providing up-to-date information on each FTA
facing the region, and providing suggestions for union responses to the move towards
free trade in the region.AucklandUniversity’s Professor Jane Kelsey and
Oxfam NZ Advocacy and Research Officer Nick Braxton assisted in preparing the
background paper and presentations during the seminar.The seminar background paper is available
here.
"I think governments have not thought
through the consequences of joining a free trade area. We hear all this talk of
efficiency and economies of scale. But the reality is, small companies will be
forced out once the big players come to town. Governments have not worked out an alternative plan on how to reemploy people if factories close and people are
left without jobs. What will happen, is that the jobless will march on the
streets and local business owners will be complaining that they are being
squeezed out of the market by foreign companies."
- Dr Wadan Narsey, Economics Professor University of the South Pacific
EU responds to
Pacific civil society concerns and questions regarding the EPA negotiations
(June 25, 2008) A number of Pacific civil society organizations (CSOs) attended an
information seminar on the ongoing negotiations for a new EPA between the EU
and the Pacific Island Countries, in April this year.At that seminar, held in Madang, PNG, PANG joined
other CSOs to present a list of key concerns and questions regarding the EPA
negotiations and their implications for the Pacific.Those questions were submitted in writing,
and two months later, the European Commission has issued a formal
response.See here for the concerns and
questions, and the EC’s response.
Trading
away our health? New free trade agreement with the EU may undermine access to
medicine in the Pacific (May 11, 2008) The European Union is seeking stronger intellectual property (IP) rights
laws in the Pacific region through a new free trade agreement (to be called an
Economic Partnership Agreement). Various
studies have indicated that the new rules on intellectual property proposed by
the EU will offer no gains in areas of interest to the Pacific (such as the
protection of traditional knowledge and genetic resources), but will advance the
commercial interests of EU corporations.
The proposed rules on intellectual property would restrict access to
medicine, access to educational material, access to seeds used in traditional
farming, and place restrictions on technology transfer, including ready access
to inputs important for development, like new software, machinery, herbicides
and pesticides etc. Some key papers on the EU’s proposed changes to intellectual property can
be found below:
Trading Away Our Rights? Free Trade and Human Rights in the Pacific This paper, from the Pacific Network on Globalisation, explains how the
EU’s proposed changes to intellectual property will undermine access to
medicine in the Pacific – in contravention of the human rights obligations of
EU member states.
An Analysis of the EC Non-Paper
on the Objectives and Possible Elements of an IP section in the EC-Pacific EPA. This paper, from the Catholic agency for Overseas Development and the
International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, details the
implications of the EU’s proposed changes to IP law for the PacificIsland
countries.The author concludes that “it
is strongly recommended that Pacific countries do not agree to the inclusion of
an IP section in the EC-Pacific EPA.
Pacific
Civil Society issues Joint Statement following Seminar on EPA negotiations.
(April 30, 2008)
Following the Seminar on the Pacific-EU Economic Partnership Agreement, held in
Madang, Papua New Guinea, civil society
representatives at the Seminar issued a joint statement covering key concerns
regarding ongoing EPA negotiations.Civil society representatives were concerned that a.) The EPAs will
reduce government revenue in the Pacific, b.) The EPAs will undermine the
sovereignty of Pacific peoples and governments, c.) The EPAs will harm
development in Pacific countries, and d.) The EPAs will reduce the ability of
Pacific governments to meet their human rights obligations to their
peoples.This joint statement is
endorsed by the Pacific Islands Association of Non-Government Organisations,
the Pacific Network on Globalisation, the Pacific Concerns Resource Centre, the
Vanuatu Association of Non-Government Organisations, the National Council of
Women – Fiji,
and the Fiji Chamber of Commerce.Read
the full statement here.
Pacific Civil Society takes concerns directly to EU ambassadors and trade
negotiators. (April 28-29, 2008)
PANG joined other national and regional civil society organisations in Madang, Papua
New Guinea, this week at a seminar on the
continuing negotiations for a new Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between
the Pacific and the European Union (EU). In late 2007, the EU forced PNG
and Fiji
to initial Interim-EPAs, under threat of a dramatic increase in tariffs on key
exports (tuna and sugar). This year, those two countries are coming to
terms with the implications of the Interim-deals they have initialed (which
contain clauses that will prevent value adding of natural resources in Fiji and
PNG, and restrict their ability to nurture new industries), while at the same
time the EU continues to push for a broad free trade agreement with the whole
region. The EU is seeking market access for its corporations, exports and
investors that goes far beyond the trade liberalisation required of World Trade
Organisation members - despite the fact most Pacific countries are not WTO
members. At the Madang seminar, concerns and questions about the
proposed EPAs were raised with the European Commission (as represented by the
Head of Delegation, Papua New Guinea,
Aldo Dell’Ariccia, other ambassadors and trade negotiators from Brussels).Few of those concerns and questions were
addressed at the Seminar, and those concerns and questions have been submitted
to the Commission in writing.See here
for detailed Pacific Civil Society concerns and questions regarding the ongoing
EPA negotiations.
"Liberalisation... is it really providing a level playing field for small nations and bigger nations. We cannot see that. Actually this trade liberalisation is making small countries dance to a tune by bigger countries. Powerful countries." - Ephraim Kalsakau, Vanuatu National Workers' Trade Union
PANG has new staff! (April, 2008) The times are a' changing at PANG. PANG bids farewell to Roshni Sami,
who has decided to move on to new opportunities, resigning from the position of
Coordinator. Ms Sami served PANG well for nearly two years, and helping to grow
the organisation. In her place PANG welcomes on board Maureen Penjueli as
the new Coordinator. Formerly of Greenpeace and the Foundation of the
Peoples of the South Pacific International (FSPI), Maureen brings with her a wealth
of campaigning and media experience in the Pacific. She said she was looking
forward to taking up the challenge of fighting for fair trade in the Pacific,
and a return to activism. This month PANG also took on Vinesh Prasad in
the position of Administration and Accounts Officer.
Pacific
Trade Ministers slam EU's approach to negotiation for new free trade deal as
"divisive and domineering" (April 18, 2008) Letters between the
Coook Islands Minister of Foreign Affairs, Wilkie Rasmussen, and the EU's top
trade official Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson highlight an increasing anger
in the Pacific about negotiations for a new Economic Partnership Agreement
(EPA) between the EU and the Pacific Island States. It is clear from the
letters that Pacific Ministers feel PNG and Fiji only signed interim-EPAs with
the EU because they were threatened with a loss of exports (of tuna and sugar)
if they didn't. The Ministers also feel that Mandelson has been a
backroom bully, and they have passed a resolution pointing out Mandelson's
"harsh and overly domineering" attitude during negotiations.
Full story available here. Letters to Peter Mandelson available here.
Job Vacancies at PANG. (January 22, 2008) PANG
is expanding. The Pacific Network on Globalisation has a big mandate -
to work on trade issues across 14 Island countries - and is looking for
good people to help PANG fulfil its important work. PANG is currently
looking to fill the position of PANG Coordinator, and Administration
and Accounts Officer. Please download full job descriptions (including
details on applying for each position) here . Applications close February 8th, 2008.
Call to protect Pacific jobs and reject imposed Free Trade agenda. (January 22, 2008) Following
the news that Flour Mills of Fiji (FMF) has closed down two milling
factories and put on hold $30 million worth of projects (that would
have created 120 new jobs) PANG has called on Pacific governments to
reject foreign imposed free trade policies that will lead to business
closures and more job losses. See article in the Fiji Times here .
Making links - PANG IEC Officer Wes Morgan, ANU Pacific Studies Convener Katerina Teaiwa and PANG Coordinator Roshni Sami.
PANG meets with Australian National University - Pacific Studies Convener. (January 22, 2008) PANG
met with the Pacific Studies Convener at the Australian National
University (Katerina Teaiwa) during a recent visit to Suva, Fiji.
Discussions centred on ways that PANG may be able to work with
researchers (both students and academics) within Australia in formal
or informal capacities. It was also noted that the new Government in
Australia is currently reviewing it's engagement with the Pacific
Island countries. Pang is very keen to develop partnerships with
researchers across the region interested in trade and economic justice
issues in the Pacific.
Heat rises in the Pacific in response to interim trade deal. (December 15, 2007) Angry
voices are being raised in the Pacific Islands following Fiji and PNG's
decision, under threats to Pacific livelihoods, to sign on to an
interim trade deal with the EU. Island Business magazine is calling
the Economic Partnership Agreement negotiations a "sell out" while NGOs
like Oxfam New Zealand have decried the deal as undermining meaningful
Pacific integration. Read the Island Business article here, and press releases from Oxfam NZ here.
PNG and Fiji pushed into interim trade deal. (December 7, 2007) It
appears there is very little to celebrate in PNG and Fiji's signing of
interim-trade deals with the EU. The EU has met virtually none of the
key development priorities put forward by the Pacific negotiators. The
EU has made no commitments on aid-for-trade, and the concessions on
European market access for tuna exports have been minimal. In return,
Fiji and PNG have abandoned Pacific-wide solidarity, and lost policy
space for setting development priorities in the future. One official
in Brussels described it as: "In effect, we have abandoned almost all
forms of traditional trade policy. In return, we got nothing [from the
EU]". Read the full story here.
EU stampedes over Pacific in rushed deal on trade. (November 24, 2007) Under
intense and grossly unfair pressure, Papua New Guinea and Fiji have
split from their Pacific counterparts and initialled an interim
agreement on trade in goods with the European Union. The EU had
threatened Pacific livelihoods by refusing to rule out raising tariffs
in 2008 on key exports of tuna and sugar. The implications of this
bullying are far reaching. Read a feature article, including
background information to the EPA negotiations, here. This article appeared in the Fiji Times on Saturday, November 24.
The Bittersweet Truth - The EU, Sugar and Poverty - On World Poverty Day (October 17, 2007) PANG
delivers a warning that free trade agreements with the EU, Australia
and New Zealand could lead to increasing poverty in the Pacific.
Dramatic trade liberalisation could lead to de-industrialisation and
unemployment. This story also highlights 'divide and rule' tactics by
the EU in negotiations for a new Economic Partnership Agreement with
the Pacific. Read the full story here...
Pacific Regional NGOs issue statement on trade at Pacific Leaders Forum. (October 15, 2007) This
year’s annual gathering of regional NGOs - the 2007 Pacific Regional
Civil Society Organisation Forum - has issued a strong statement to
Pacific Leaders, urging them to stand up for the rights of the Pacific
in negotiations for a new trade deal with the EU. Read full story here, and read Pacific CSO Forum Statement here...
Stand Strong - 2007 Pacific Regional CSO Forum delivers a message to Pacific leaders. Photo: Maureen Penjueli
'The EPA is about Free Trade, not Development'. (October 15, 2007) PANG Coordinator Roshni Sami delivered a rousing speech to the Pacific NGOs annual forum. Her presentation to the
2007 Pacific Regional Civil Society Organisation Forum, in Tonga,
focussed on the implications of Free Trade for the Pacific, especially
the current negotiations for a new Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA)
with the EU. . See full text of her speech here...
PANG warns Pacific negotiators to be wary of ‘circling sharks’. (October 7,2007) A
warning that any trade concessions offered to the EU in negotiations
for a new ‘Economic Partnership Agreement’ may be demanded by Australia and NZ as well – with devastating consequences for the Pacific.Australia
and NZ form a much larger share of Pacific trade, and tariffs collected
on imports from our ‘Big Brother’ neighbours provides essential revenue
for public services in much of the Pacific. Read more here...
Find
out about the September 2007, Global Day of Action against the
'Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs)' the EU is forcing on its
ex-colonies.
PANG invited representatives from the EU to come and drink kava with
representatives of Pacific society, to share growing concerns about the
bully-tactics the EU is using to force the Pacific to sign an agreement
that offers them little. It was an interesting kava-ceremony.
(September 27, 2007) Read more here...
PANG organises a public action to raise awareness about European bans on kava products.The EU is constantly lecturing developing countries that they should be developing export industries to help alleviate poverty.In the late 1990s the Pacific had a vibrant kava export industry – worth around $US200 million each year.In
2001, the EU imposed a ban on kava-products which decimated the Pacific
export industry over night. The World Health Organisation says kava
exports can safely begin again, the time is right for the EU to lift
the ban. (September 27, 2007) Read more here...
PANG Releases an official paper on the European Kava Bans "Time to Make Trade Fair - Lift the Kava Bans".PANG has prepared an in-depth analysis of the European bans on kava products.Feel free to use and share this paper. (September, 2007) Available here…